AJR

   THE LAW OFFICES OF

ANTHONY J. ROBINSON

  (626) 797-5001

Back Contact Us Expert Witness Feedback Location Need a Lawyer Robinson's Rules Search Page Second Opinion

 Criminal Law Article

Home
Back

We are members of:

Megalaw.com

Web Resources:

Freefind.com

Animation Factory

Microsoft MSN Explorer

Microsoft Internet Explorer

In Memory of 09-11-01

In Memory

In Memory of the Victims of 09-11-01

Lest We Forget

FrontPage 2002

 

          

 

 

ARTICLE FOR DECEMBER  2006: THE BIG LIE

       Something happened this month that gave me pause to reflect back on the basics of criminal defense. I decided that maybe it was time to review some basic do's and don'ts regarding telling the truth to your lawyer. Fortunately this situation doesn't occur very often, so it is real easy to assume that everyone knows that lying to your lawyer is stupid. Well I was wrong, there are still people out there who think it is perfectly alright to make up stories and try to pass them off as truth. The reason they do this is sheer arrogance  and stupidity. Some people think that they are so smart and so clever that they can concoct a tale that will withstand the most challenging cross-examination. For any of you that think like that let me dissuade you from thinking that way.

        Personally I  think that if I don't know what  the truth is, I am at a distinct disadvantage. That doesn't mean that everyone agrees with me. To be honest there are two schools of thought on this point among attorneys. One school says that they don't want to know what the truth is. They feel that if they don't know what the truth is, they can take advantage of asserting certain things as true when in fact they don't know if the thing is true or not.

        The other school of thought wants to know the truth because it enables the attorney to give you very accurate advice and allows the attorney to know what areas not  to go into. It also prevents the attorney from allowing his or her client from committing perjury. I believe in the later school of thought. While it somewhat limits what I can assert as true, it also prevents me from accidentally misrepresenting a fact as true when in reality it may not be true. I think that not knowing the truth severely hampers an attorneys ability to advise his or her client without running afoul of ethical considerations.

Three Prong Indy

        Let me give you two examples of what I am talking about. Assume that a client has assaulted a person and the client denies the assault, so the attorney doesn't know the truth. If the police asks if the client is willing to take a polygraph (lie detector) test, the attorney may agree to do so. If he or she does, the client will probably fail the test, which will highlight the fact that the client is lying. It will also make the attorney look foolish.  Another example would be if in the same case the Police requested a DNA sample of the client to compare with a sample taken from the victim. If the samples match, the client's goose is cooked.

        A client should be aware that a  lie is the hardest thing to carry off, because it isn't the truth.  People who lie do so because they fear the truth. They have done something wrong and don't want to face the consequences. I can understand not wanting to get caught for something stupid that you may have done.  What I do not understand is people who make things worse by lying to the one person who is trying to help them.  This places you at a distinct disadvantage because your attorney doesn't have a clue what is real and what isn't. Another type of person simply lives in a parallel reality and really believes their lies. It is not always clear whether or not the really believe their lies, so the possibility exists that they may be able to pass a polygraph test.

        This problem has it's roots in the concept that most criminals convict themselves out of their own mouths. It doesn't take brilliant police work, it only takes persistence and an ability to remember what you said. The truth, on the other hand,  doesn't require any mental gymnastics. Most often the truth is fairly straight forward, while most liars tend to create their deceptions with a web of unnecessary factoids that overly complicate the story. Each factoid gives the police one additional fact to check out, the more facts, the more chance to trip you up. Why? because if the factoid isn't real it won't check out. If it doesn't check out the rest of the story starts to unravel. Eventually you cop out to the truth.

Three Prong Indy

        If you are guilty of doing something stupid do yourself a favor and don't lie to your attorney. Because if the police are investigating the case, and you are a "person of interest," they will invite you down to the police station for a little chat. Unless they are going to arrest you anyway, you are better off declining  the invitation. You have a right under the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution to remain silent, you do not have to talk to them. So use your rights to the fullest extent and keep your piehole closed. The reality is that you will not be able to talk yourself out of trouble by lying, you will only talk yourself into trouble.

        If they think you may be involved in a case, they will have already marshaled a parade of facts that they believe make you look guilty. They want to see what your story is, so they can compare it to the known facts of the case.   If your story doesn't check out, then you have drawn attention to yourself as the probable perpetrator. If you say nothing, they have nothing from you to check. No story, no facts, no alibi, no nothing. It doesn't mean that they will stop thinking that you are probably guilty. In fact the mere fact that you refuse to talk to them will make them believe that you are more likely guilty. Which is why only totally innocent people should ever talk to the police. Guilty people should keep their big fat mouths closed, but they usually don't. Which is why they are usually convicted. Get it?

        You are better off being thought of as a criminal, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.  The fact that the police may think that you are more likely than not guilty, doesn't mean that they have enough evidence to prove it. They have to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you are guilty. You are under no obligation to help them out. You have an absolute right to sit there and say nothing. In most cases this is the best course of action, as it prevents them from learning anything from you. After all, a jury is most likely to believe any admission that you may make as true. So if you say that you did it, why would a jury not think that you are?

Three Prong Indy

        Without trying to sound like a know-it-all, I still think that the best thing you can do is not to say anything. The second thing that you should do is to retain a criminal defense lawyer and consult him or her as to your next move. Sometimes talking to the police is beneficial and sometimes it isn't. Only an experienced criminal defense lawyer can advise you whether or not to talk to the police. As a general rule, you should never try and do this yourself.

       

Three Prong Indy

        In another case I have discovered a "victim" that doesn't know or care what the truth is. They are making false accusations to the police in an attempt to get the police to prosecute this individual. To say this type of activity is wrong is an understatement. In conclusion, if you lie to your lawyer, you will undoubtedly suffer the consequences of your actions. You will have no one to blame but yourself for the outcome, so don't do it.

  Back to Top

                                                        Send mail to AJR@ANTHONYJROBINSON.COM with questions or comments about this web site. Copyright © 2002-2005 Law Offices of Anthony J. Robinson.  Any unauthorized duplication or reproduction of any and all contents are in violation of all applicable laws.  Last modified: February 10, 2010 Version 2.00