AJR

   THE LAW OFFICES OF

ANTHONY J. ROBINSON

  (626) 797-5001

Back Contact Us Expert Witness Feedback Location Need a Lawyer Robinson's Rules Search Page Second Opinion

 October 2003

Home
Back

We are members of:

Megalaw.com

Web Resources:

Freefind.com

Animation Factory

Microsoft MSN Explorer

Microsoft Internet Explorer

In Memory of 09-11-01

In Memory

In Memory of the Victims of 09-11-01

Lest We Forget

FrontPage 2002

 

          

 

 

Article for October 2003: Don't Even Think About It!

        While it  has been awhile since I posted an article, some things happened during the hiatus that I thought merits some general discussion. First situation: Someone came to my office with one of those common problems that we come across on occasion.  He had a girlfriend who had a business that wasn't doing very well so he decided to help her out.  I have also heard of women who tried to help boyfriends or husbands who tried to help their wives or vice versa. It really doesn't matter who is helping who.

        In this case  the woman was sued by several former employees for back wages. It seems that she owned a meat market that wasn't doing very well and her boyfriend tried to help her out by volunteering to manage the store once in a while. In any event, when the store went under and the former employees sued for wages they named the boyfriend as a defendant. He was served with process and was upset. Instead of seeing an attorney, he gave his girlfriend the papers with a directive to "straighten out her mess."  

        With that being done, he gave it no further thought, until the judgment came in against him for over $40,000.00. Then he decided to spring into action and filed a timely notice of appeal. After all it wasn't his business. He quickly discovered to his chagrin, that in order to appeal the case he had to post the entire judgment with an appeal bond. The bond would be used to pay off the judgment if he lost. Bottom line - he doesn't have $40,000.00 or property worth $40,000.00 to put up as collateral. What can he do now? Not much.

Three Prong Indy

        What do we learn from that case? Never ever depend on someone else to take care of something that pertains to you. Period, no exceptions.  Take care of it right away and do it yourself. Even if you think that it has nothing to do with you. His failure to appear and contest the case resulted in a default judgment being taken against him. Something that probably wouldn't have happened if he had shown up to Court in person. He could have probably taken care of the entire matter in a couple of hours.

        You are probably wondering "Why is this a problem? Can't he just tell the Judge that he made a mistake? Surely the Judge would see that he is innocent." Right? Wrong again. In order to correct this problem you must file an appeal. In order to do that you must file an appeal bond for the entire amount. In this case $40,000.00. People in the bonding business call it a totally collateralized bond. Which means if you lose the appeal, the money is immediately paid to the Plaintiffs. It's a crap shoot. If he wins, he walks away a free man, if he loses, the money is gone. Of course he could appeal again, but that would require a new bond.

Three Prong Indy

        He has one other option and that is to file for bankruptcy. That will discharge the debt without regard to how it was incurred. The down side is that his credit will take a significant hit for seven years. If he wants to buy a house, he will have difficulty. If he wants to buy a car or get a credit card, this is going to cause him problems for years. He will also have the stigma of having filed bankruptcy attached forever. All because he didn't take a Summons seriously. The entire problem is one hundred percent avoidable.

        You might ask yourself why didn't he just keep fighting? The reason is simple. While the amount of the judgment was significant. the costs of defending it would eventually far exceed the judgment. You might ask couldn't he just sue the Plaintiffs or his girlfriend? The answer is "Sure he could."  He just wouldn't collect because everyone but him was broke. In this scenario he was the "Deep Pocket,"  and he didn't protect himself very well. Relative to the others, he was rich.

        He is having a great deal of trouble accepting the fact that he made such a terrible mistake. I really don't blame him. On the surface it seemed so simple and it would have been had he taken care of business in the beginning, but he didn't, and now he is paying the price. Once again the sweetness of not hiring a lawyer to help you  is offset by the sourness of the  outcome. Don't be like him, always take a court summons seriously and protect yourself.

Three Prong Indy

        Second, primarily has to do with family law. However this could conceivably apply in other situations as well. When you go to Court leave your lovers, boyfriends and girlfriends at home. If you are a party to a family law case such as a divorce, showing up to court with your girl or boyfriend will "NOT" help your cause. It makes you look slutty and cheap. Trying to pass them off as an employer, old friend, neighbor or other "friend" won't work either. Especially when they feel inclined to interject themselves into the proceedings to "help you."

        There is an old saying that goes "It is better to be thought of as a fool, than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."  There is nothing like raging hormones to make the situation worse. Boyfriend lets his testosterone get in the road and either gets into an altercation with the attorney or the other party. Either way it's clearly no good. In the case I am thinking of, the Bailiff referred to the boyfriend as "Bachelor Number Two."  He saw it for what it was; sleazy.   The judge and the clerk also overheard the boyfriend too. In case you are wondering what the boyfriend was upset about, it was because the judge granted the father visitation with his child.

        You don't have to be a Rhoades  scholar to figure out that the Judge and the Court personal are going to discuss this incident and the judge will probably make either a written or mental note about the woman. When it comes time to  decide the case, this will hurt her case. She alleged that the father was abusive and hurt the child. When in reality she was only using this as a ploy to try and gain an advantage over her husband in the divorce case. She didn't have to do this. If she wanted to divorce him, she should have just left and done it.

        She knew that if she did that and showed up with a new boyfriend, no one would feel sorry for her. So she wrongfully tried to make my client look bad merely to cover up her bad behavior. It was obvious that she had been carrying on behind my client's back while they were married and she was trying to cover it up. This may cause some of you to ask "Hey wait a minute, isn't California a no fault state?"  The answer is "yes it is."  On the issue of getting a divorce, fault is not an issue. However, fault can be  an issue in custody and visitation proceedings. Surprise.

Three Prong Indy

        Her behavior also bears on her credibility as a witness at any hearing concerning her allegations of abuse. If the Court feels that they need more information and the judge orders a E.C. § 730 evaluation, this behavior will be examined in detail. Moreover, since the mom and the child are living with the boyfriend "and his wife" the Court may entertain a motion to change custody based on the boyfriends behavior and the impact it may have on the child. This could possibly be rectified if the mom moves out on her own.

        Personally I think that this kind of behavior is not only sleazy, it is detrimental to the child.  You may not see it, but your children love both parents. They do not view your new paramour the way you do. They usually have very negative feeling for this person, because they miss their missing parent and the family unit. They also view this person as the one who destroyed their family. I won't even mention that he is also cheating on his own wife and shortchanging his children to be with her. And I will never understand why someone wants to be with someone who has demonstrated a willingness to commit infidelity. Do you really think that either of you won't do it again? If you do, quit kidding yourself.

        While either of these situations had the potential for a favorable outcome, the odds were clearly against that happening.  When it comes to your life, liberty or money, you should never play Russian Roulette with the outcome. It always pays to be proactive and conservative. Never bet against the odds and common sense. If you do most of the time you will lose.  Despite what you may think to the contrary, that is the reality. Don't let yourself be a fool.

 Three Prong Indy

Back to Top

                                                        Send mail to AJR@ANTHONYJROBINSON.COM with questions or comments about this web site. Copyright © 2002-2005 Law Offices of Anthony J. Robinson.  Any unauthorized duplication or reproduction of any and all contents are in violation of all applicable laws.  Last modified: February 10, 2010 Version 2.00